
dear vancouver art gallery, thank you for making me less cynical. please understand, i come from the land of the rom.
i have never seen an exhibit that i didnt love at this gallery, and i assumed expanding horizons: painting and photography of american and canadian landscape 1860-1918 would be the first.
yes, i am an art historian that can be snobby about my art, and landscapes are one of those genres that oftentimes feel the wrath of my snobbery.
one may also find that many canadian art history students have some attitude towards the group of seven, as they are shoved down our throats everywhere we turn. i am one of those students. however, my frustration with the group of seven is how their works are presented.
these artists married the canadian landscape with abstraction, and pushed for a canadian presence in the abstract art movement.. which was huge. do galleries tell me this? nope. do they display these works with international abstract artists from the 1920s to show me their greater significance? absolutely not. so what do they do? give me the exact same white cube room with the exclusively group of seven works, talking about the artists biographies blah blah blah.
in comes vancouver art gallery *sigh of relief*
expanding horizons uses themes like the emergence of nationalist ideas, and the relationship between urban expansion and nature to decipher the artistic fascination with the landscapes we inhabit. the exhibit includes painting, photography, and video. you can almost feel your brain cells being re-activated. my friends and i spent quite some time in this exhibit, and we were amazed at how the juxtaposition of different kinds of landscapes made them so much more interesting and fresh. i actually became enamoured with an aj casson and sat with it for a while. probably the same one that i would have ran past with my eyes closed in a group of seven room.